“House lawmakers have taken a step toward extending crucial—but expiring—financial protections to seniors receiving long-term care in home or community settings. They did so with backing from more than a dozen health care and provider organizations.”
Typically, to financially qualify for Medicaid long-term services and supports (LTSS), a person must meet specific low-income and asset requirements. Marriage often makes working through those eligibility requirements more difficult. It can mean potentially placing a spouse in the position to “spend down” or bankrupt themselves to secure care support for their partner.
Home Health Care News reports in a recent article, “Medicaid Bill Would Prevent Spousal Impoverishment as Route to Home Care Coverage,” that as of August 2018, more than 73 million people combined were enrolled in Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP). Those numbers are from federal Medicaid data; more than 66 million individuals were enrolled in Medicaid, while about 6.5 million were enrolled in CHIP.
In order to prevent self-induced bankruptcy to keep a spouse eligible for Medicaid, Congress created spousal impoverishment rules in the late 1980s. Those rules originally required states to protect part of a married couple’s income and assets to give the “community spouse” adequate living expenses, when determining nursing home financial eligibility. However, states were also given the option to apply the rules to home and community-based services (HCBS) waivers.
Section 2404 of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) changed that and required the spousal impoverishment rules to treat Medicaid HCBS and institutional care the same way. That law is set to expire at the end of December. That means that individual states would once again be the decision-makers, when it comes to spousal impoverishment in home care.
In 2018, all 50 states were applying the spousal impoverishment rules to HCBS waivers, and five states (Arkansas, Illinois, Maine, Minnesota, and New Hampshire) plan to stop applying the spousal impoverishment rules to some or all of their HCBS waivers, if Section 2404 expires at the end of the year.
With support from LeadingAge, the National PACE Association, the National Council on Aging and several other groups, U.S. Representatives Debbie Dingell (D-Mich.) and Fred Upton (R-Mich.) on Friday introduced the Protecting Married Seniors from Impoverishment Act. If the bipartisan piece of legislation passes, it would permanently extend spousal impoverishment protections for Medicaid beneficiaries receiving long-term care in a home or community care setting.
“Our long-term care system is broken,” Rep. Dingell said in a statement. “Seniors and their families already face too many challenges when navigating long-term care, and they should not have to get divorced or go broke, just to be eligible for the care they need.”
It’s not known the level of Congressional support the Protecting Married Senior from Impoverishment Act will get, but the fact that most states plan to continue protections on an optional basis is encouraging, LeadingAge President and CEO Katie Smith Sloan said in a statement.
“As a national organization, LeadingAge has consistently supported federal law establishing protections against spousal impoverishment,” Sloan said. “We support the legislation to extend the current protection.”
LeadingAge in Washington, D.C is an industry association that represents more than 6,000 not-for-profit senior care providers. If the Dingell-Upton bill fails, LeadingAge members in states that don’t plan to continue impoverishment protections will likely be negatively affected.
The National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys, Inc., the National Association for Home Care & Hospice, and AARP are the three organizations lobbying on issues, such as “spousal impoverishment” in the past two years.
Reference: Home Health Care News (November 19, 2018) “Medicaid Bill Would Prevent Spousal Impoverishment as Route to Home Care Coverage”